previous episode

Automation and Make

Dependencies on Data and Code

next episode

Overview

Teaching: 15 min
Exercises: 15 min
Questions

  • How can I write a Makefile to update things when my scripts have changed rather than my input files?

Objectives

  • Output files are a product not only of input files but of the scripts or code that created the output files.

  • Recognize and avoid false dependencies.

Our Makefile now looks like this:

# Generate summary table.
results.txt : *.dat
        python zipf_test.py $^ > $@

# Count words.
.PHONY : dats
dats : isles.dat abyss.dat last.dat

isles.dat : books/isles.txt
        python wordcount.py $< $@

abyss.dat : books/abyss.txt
        python wordcount.py $< $@

last.dat : books/last.txt
        python wordcount.py $< $@

.PHONY : clean
clean :
        rm -f *.dat
        rm -f results.txt

Our data files are a product not only of our text files but the script, wordcount.py, that processes the text files and creates the data files. A change to wordcount.py (e.g. to add a new column of summary data or remove an existing one) results in changes to the .dat files it outputs. So, let’s pretend to edit wordcount.py, using touch, and re-run Make:

$ make dats
$ touch wordcount.py
$ make dats

Nothing happens! Though we’ve updated wordcount.py our data files are not updated because our rules for creating .dat files don’t record any dependencies on wordcount.py.

We need to add wordcount.py as a dependency of each of our data files also:

isles.dat : books/isles.txt wordcount.py
        python wordcount.py $< $@

abyss.dat : books/abyss.txt wordcount.py
        python wordcount.py $< $@

last.dat : books/last.txt wordcount.py
        python wordcount.py $< $@

If we pretend to edit wordcount.py and re-run Make,

$ touch wordcount.py
$ make dats

then we get:

python wordcount.py books/isles.txt isles.dat
python wordcount.py books/abyss.txt abyss.dat
python wordcount.py books/last.txt last.dat

Dry run

make can show the commands it will execute without actually running them if we pass the -n flag:

$ touch wordcount.py
$ make -n dats

This gives the same output to the screen as without the -n flag, but the commands are not actually run. Using this ‘dry-run’ mode is a good way to check that you have set up your Makefile properly before actually running the commands in it.

The following figure shows the dependencies embodied within our Makefile, involved in building the results.txt target, after adding wordcount.py and zipf_test.py as dependencies to their respective target files:

results.txt dependencies after adding wordcount.py and zipf_test.py as dependencies

Why Don’t the .txt Files Depend on wordcount.py?

.txt files are input files and have no dependencies. To make these depend on wordcount.py would introduce a false dependency.

Intuitively, we should also add wordcount.py as dependency for results.txt, as the final table should be rebuilt as we remake the .dat files. However, it turns out we don’t have to! Let’s see what happens to results.txt when we update wordcount.py:

$ touch wordcount.py
$ make results.txt

then we get:

python wordcount.py books/abyss.txt abyss.dat
python wordcount.py books/isles.txt isles.dat
python wordcount.py books/last.txt last.dat
python zipf_test.py abyss.dat isles.dat last.dat > results.txt

The whole pipeline is triggered, even the creation of the results.txt file! To understand this, note that according to the dependency figure, results.txt depends on the .dat files. The update of wordcount.py triggers an update of the *.dat files. Thus, make sees that the dependencies (the .dat files) are newer than the target file (results.txt) and thus it recreates results.txt. This is an example of the power of make: updating a subset of the files in the pipeline triggers rerunning the appropriate downstream steps.

Updating One Input File

What will happen if you now execute:

$ touch books/last.txt
$ make results.txt
  1. only last.dat is recreated
  2. all .dat files are recreated
  3. only last.dat and results.txt are recreated
  4. all .dat and results.txt are recreated

Solution

3. only last.dat and results.txt are recreated.

Follow the dependency tree to understand the answer(s).

wordcount as a Dependency of results.txt.

What would happen if you actually added wordcount.py as dependency of results.txt, and why?

Solution

If you change the rule for the results.txt file like this:

results.txt : *.dat wordcount.py
        python zipf_test.py $^ > $@

wordcount.py becomes a part of $^, thus the command becomes

python zipf_test.py abyss.dat isles.dat last.dat wordcount.py > results.txt

This results in an error from zipf_test.py as it tries to parse the script as if it were a .dat file. Try this by running:

$ make results.txt

You’ll get

python zipf_test.py abyss.dat isles.dat last.dat wordcount.py > results.txt
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "zipf_test.py", line 19, in <module>
    counts = load_word_counts(input_file)
  File "path/to/wordcount.py", line 39, in load_word_counts
    counts.append((fields[0], int(fields[1]), float(fields[2])))
IndexError: list index out of range
make: *** [results.txt] Error 1

We still have to add the zipf-test.py script as dependency to results.txt. Given the answer to the challenge above, we cannot use $^ for the rule. Instead we can use $< to refer to the first dependency i.e. *.dat :

results.txt : *.dat zipf_test.py
        python zipf_test.py $< > $@

Where We Are

This Makefile contains everything done so far in this topic.

Key Points

previous episode

next episode